Notes RSS feed

---

A recent podcast reminded me how deeply individual our dietary needs can be. So I decided to check my genetic profile — not just out of curiosity, but to see what my DNA actually says about what helps or hurts my performance.

Turns out? My body had been whispering the truth all along.

The analysis confirmed many of my long-held intuitions:

• I naturally prefer carbs and metabolize them well, but I gain fat easily if they come too late in the day.
• I don’t crave fatty meats — and genetically, I’m better off avoiding saturated fats and processed meats.
• My body doesn’t handle overeating late at night. This isn’t just a lifestyle thing — it’s in my genes.

That last point hit home the hardest. So I’ve returned to what older generations used to say: “Don’t eat late.”

Now I follow an 8-hour eating window, starting in the morning and finishing no later than 16:00–17:00. The goal isn’t restriction — it’s alignment.

What I’m avoiding:

• Evening meals
• Late-night snacking (especially sugars)
• Saturated animal fats (like pork or fatty beef)
• Overeating in general — my appetite control genes are strong, I just have to let them work

Genetic markers that shaped this shift:

SNP (rsID)	Genotype	Interpretation
rs780094	GG	Best carb tolerance in the morning, fat gain if late-day carb load
rs9939609	AA	FTO protective variant – low natural appetite, strong satiety
rs174537	GG	Inflammation-prone with omega-6; benefit from more omega-3
rs4988235	CT	Intermediate lactose tolerance – okay in moderation
rs4994	CC	Slower fat-burning efficiency (ADRB3), especially under high-carb load
rs1558902	AA	Better satiety and food control, less impulsive eating
rs1535	TT	Low DHA synthesis – needs external supplementation (taking Nordic Naturals DHA)

My type (in plain English):

Efficient, low-appetite carb-burner — but only if meals are well-timed and clean. I thrive on early-day structure, moderate carbs, and low-stress routines.

This isn’t about following a trend. It’s about syncing my behavior with my biology — and respecting the subtle truths my body has been showing me all along.

Between August 16th and 22nd, I spent a week in the mountains.
Every day: 30–40k steps and ~800 meters up, but all in Zone 1 because I was with my daughter.
It turned into the perfect form of recovery — movement without pressure, nature, and no training stress.

I also completed my caffeine reset.
I’m proud: no coffee. First time in years, and I feel the difference.

And then, the peak metrics arrived:

• Aug 21st:
  • Best HRV of the year: 139
  • Best resting HR of the year: 39
  • Best sleep score of the year: 96/100 (Garmin)
  • Lowest stress of the year: 16 (Garmin)

Finally, I managed to flip my evening schedule.
I’ve been consistently going to bed before 23:00.
For me, as an Achiever, this has always been the hardest — I would stretch the day endlessly to “do one more useful thing.”
But the best investment in tomorrow is to go to sleep earlier today.

Let’s see how long I can hold it — I’ve never managed to keep this habit stable for long. 😅

Finished Level 1 of Mobility 2.

Was it worth it? Yes — even though the improvements were subtle.
They show up in real life: like getting into a car parked in a ridiculously tight spot,
or avoiding a sprained ankle after stepping into a hole.
It’s not about range. It’s about control. Confidence.
Something shifts.

I used implementation intentions to build the habit:
Mobility break right after second breakfast and first deep work block.
This worked surprisingly well — as long as sessions stayed under 15 minutes.

Once they started pushing 30 minutes toward the end, consistency dropped.
Not from lack of motivation — just time constraints.
Lesson: system friction matters.

Progress?
This isn’t lifting. You don’t feel 10% stronger each week.
Some movements got a bit easier. But mostly it’s a postural presence that sneaks into everyday motion.

And that’s the whole point.

Next step:
I’ll re-run Level 1 from scratch —
same routine, but with a different nervous system and more somatic awareness.

Let’s see what changes.

For the past few months, I’ve had a simple but powerful morning ritual:
wake up → drink water → take supplements → do 8 minutes of light gymnastics.
During that last part, I always listen to motivational compilations or philosophy snippets — short speeches from athletes, thinkers, and peak performers.

And something clicked.

All these highly successful people — Khabib, Ronaldo, Kobe Bryant, Jordan Peterson, David Goggins, etc. — they say the same things.
Different words. Same patterns.
Same mindset.

Recently, one voice really stood out. A bit older, slower, but razor‑sharp:
Jim Rohn.

Maybe it’s the phase I’m in — deeply reflective, immersed in learning, reading, thinking, rewiring my brain (thanks, neuroplasticity) — but Rohn hit me hard.

Not with hype. With clarity.

He gave his seminars back in the 1980s — the decade I was born — yet somehow his voice reached across time and pulled me in.
There’s something about his calm, deliberate rhythm… his structured wisdom… that felt timeless and magnetic.

So I started listening to full seminars. And thinking. And writing.
I began planning my days more deliberately and doing evening reflections in a journal.

Many things he says, I had discovered on my own — like:

• “Learn to work harder on yourself than on your job.”
• “You can read your way out of almost any trap.”
• “Practice emotions like you practice physical skills.”

Even things like using traffic jams or delays as training for emotional resilience — I had already been doing that intuitively. But hearing it articulated gave it structure and gravity.

Then came the phrasing that paused me:

“If You Have Enough Reasons, You Can Do the Most Incredible Things.”

“Reasons come first, answers second.
You don’t get the answers to do well until you get the reasons.”

That felt like the crux of all growth.

That’s the key.
And that’s where I paused.
Sat in silence for a while.
Fell into thought.

There’s something deeply human in his voice. Not just knowledge. Wisdom.

And for now, that’s all I’ll say.

Recently, I stumbled upon a brilliant metric that perfectly captures the quality of communication – in meetings, in leadership, in life.
It’s called Signal Ratio.

Originally from engineering (signal-to-noise ratio), it’s now showing up in productivity circles and leadership talks. The core idea is dead simple:

How much of what you’re saying is actually signal – and how much is just noise?

Kevin O’Leary, a former Apple vendor, once said:

“Jobs had maybe 80/20 – 80% signal, 20% noise.
But the only person he knew who was better was Elon Musk.
He’s basically at 100% signal.”

That hit me hard.
Suddenly I understood why I fucking hate meetings.

Not because they’re boring.
Not because they’re long.
Not even because people talk too much.

But because the Signal Ratio is like 5/95.
5% signal.
95% bullshit.

And since I lead with Strategic Thinking in my Gallup strengths — with themes like Learner, Focus, Analytical and Intellection — this shit hits me even harder than most. I don’t just want action. I want clarity, precision, and ideas that matter.

---

🚀 What’s next?

Now I’m wondering — if AI can summarize meetings, why not measure Signal Ratio too?

Like seriously:

• How many decisions were made?
• How many actionable insights?

And at the end, just give me a clean stat:

Signal Ratio: 14% — you could’ve emailed this.

If that tool exists — I want it.
If it doesn’t — maybe we should build it.